Executive Presence, Part 1

Have you ever been in the presence of someone whose presence clearly marked them as a leader? That presence has a term that describes it; executive presence. While not all leaders have executive presence, those who do seem to rise above others, even when they might not have the title of leader. That is to say, while not all leaders have executive presence, not all those who have executive presence have the title of leader, even though they carry with them the unofficial title into every encounter and meeting.

Some acquire Executive presence by instinct, yet the qualities and behaviors that make up executive presence can be learned. While it can be subjective and vary across cultures and contexts, eight core skills/behaviors make up executive presence and many lesser ones. Among the eight core skills/behaviors, there is a certain degree of overlap where one skill/behavior has aspects of another even while having unique qualities of its own. Each of the skills/behaviors fit the Goldilocks paradigm. That is, most people have each of these skills/behaviors but either exhibit too little or too much. The person who is perceived as having an executive presence is the individual who has found the sweet spot of “just right” for each of the skills/behaviors. These are the Level 5 leaders.

When exploring the different skills/behaviors, both ends of the extreme will be touched upon and what it looks like when it is “just right.” Evaluating one’s self in each of these skills/behaviors accurately and then implementing a plan to move toward the sweet spot takes an extraordinary level of self-awareness (which is part of one of the skills/behaviors). Since most assume they are self-aware, it will be the unique individual who can set aside their own bias and open themselves up to accurate scrutiny, which is why executive presence is so attractive and so elusive. It can’t be accomplished by reading an article.

It requires focused study and discipline to evolve to the point that others perceive executive presence. Sadly, most will read this article and check off each of the skills/behaviors as accomplished and therefore assume that they have this elusive quality . . . when in fact they do not. Beware of confirmation bias which resists self-awareness and change.

In the following posts I’ll describe the eight skills/behaviors that I believe make up executive presence. For each one, I’ll try to describe what it looks like when there is too little, or too much of that particular skill/behavior, as well as focus on the “just right.”

Level 5 Leadership

According to Jim Collins in Good to Great, one of the key traits of Level 5 leadership is: “ambition first and foremost for the company and concern for its success rather than for one’s own riches and personal renown. Level 5 leaders want to see the company even more successful in the next generation, comfortable with the idea that most people won’t even know that the roots of that success trace back to their efforts.” (25, 26) This placing of the interests of the company above self evidently is an unusual trait. It seems that many of those who are willing to step into leadership do so because they are interested in leaving a legacy which can be directly traced back to their wise leadership.

When discussing this with my daughter, she thought the Level 5 leader might be characterized by an individual whose concern for those who work for them, those they lead, is genuine and interested in their best as well as the company. She also postulated that the Level 5 leader might also be one who does not see themselves as the lynchpin of leadership, and often are unaware of their own ability. These observations about Level 5 leaders is born out by Collins’ research. 

Collings also states that: “…Level 5 leadership is not just about humility and modesty. It is equally about ferocious resolve, an almost stoic determination to do whatever needs to be done to make the company great. … Level 5 leaders are fanatically driven, infected with an incurable need to produce results.”(30) The ability to make decisions, often hard and unpopular decisions is not as prevalent as one might assume. Even harder is to stay a course which for the short-run seems as if it will have an irrecoverable effect. Level 5 leaders are able to analyze the data and trends, face the hard truths of the reality and make decisions which keep the company focused and successful.

Finally, “Level 5 Leaders look out the window to apportion credit to factors outside themselves when things go well (and if they cannot find a specific person or event to give credit to, they credit good luck). At the same time, they look in the mirror to apportion responsibility, never blaming bad luck when things go poorly.” (35) This is entirely the opposite of most leaders, who look to blame something, or anything, for their failure.

Now we come full circle back to a concept which Collins refutes, but his research supports (in my opinion): i.e. everything rises and falls on leadership. You probably thought I would come back to this and you were right. The Level 5 Leader is aware that what happens can be reacted to, either to blame (wallowing in a victim mentality) or to see the opportunities (moving forward). 

See, my take on this Level 5 leadership thing can be summed up on these points: 

  1. Everything rises and falls on leadership – leaders take responsibility.
  2. Leaders care about those they work with, wanting them to realize their potential
  3. Leaders want results, NEED results, and don’t care who gets the credit. (this last part is definitely descriptive of a different kind of leader)
  4. Leaders want the best for the company and for things to be better AFTER they leave than even it was when they were there.

Let’s think about this